← Back to scanner

AI Agent Readiness
Leaderboard

How well do the web’s top sites work with AI agents? Scores based on WebMCP support, semantic HTML, structured data, and agent usability.

Seeded with real scan data · Feb 22, 2026 · WebMCP adoption: 0%

🏆 Top Performers

4 sites
🥇
scanner.v1be.codesDeveloper Tools

44→92 in one weekend 🏆

A92/100
🔵 Level 5: AI-Native
🥈
stripe.comPayments

Has llms.txt ✓

C63/100
🟢 Level 4: Operable
🥉
anthropic.comAI

No WebMCP, no JSON-LD

D56/100
🟡 Level 3: Discoverable
#4
openai.comAI

No llms.txt (ironic)

D53/100
🟡 Level 3: Discoverable

😬 Hall of Shame

Notable underperformers
🥇
github.comDeveloper Tools

Rejects llms.txt (406)

F38/100
🟠 Level 2: Crawlable
🥈
linear.appProductivity

Has llms.txt ✓

D46/100
🟡 Level 3: Discoverable
🥉
vercel.comDeveloper Tools

Has llms.txt ✓

D48/100
🟡 Level 3: Discoverable

🤔 OpenAI and GitHub both score below 55 — despite building tools for AI agents.

57/100
Average score
0%
WebMCP adoption
2/7
Sites at Grade C+

Where does your site rank?

Free scan in under 10 seconds. Get your score, grade, and a prioritised list of fixes.

⚡ Scan your site

Want your site featured? Scan it and share the results on Twitter/X tagging @ckorhonen